Strikes on Russia: Voters won’t hold Biden accountable, but history will
By: Rachel Marsden
The outgoing US president is risking direct war with Moscow knowing he can’t be held accountable by voters anymore
The nameless and faceless American officials who’ve apparently been running
the country, since US President Joe Biden has been busy perfecting his Weekend
At Bernie’s routine during his final weeks in office, told the Western press
that Biden had authorized American long range missile (ATACMS) strikes into
Russian territory. Go ahead, Joe, tell ‘em!
But apparently Joe didn’t want to “tell ‘em,” choosing instead to wander off
into the Amazonian jungle when asked about it during a trip to Brazil. That also
just happens to be where the good hallucinogenic plants are that would allow any
remaining functional brain cells to forget about his pratfalling into a
potential third world war.
How far inside Russia are we even talking here? Who knows. Joe’s still on
safari, at least in the clinical, psychological sense. So enter “Jungle” Josep
Borrell, EU diplomacy chief, who once infamously stood in front of a bunch of
European diplomatic students and referred to Europe as a “garden” and the
developing world as a “jungle.” It was Borrell who had to clarify for the entire
world that what Joe really means is that he’s giving Ukraine the ability to
strike 300km into Russia.
Guess we’re just supposed to take his word for it, then, since America doesn’t
have a manager on shift?
Then the Western press further specified that it was only really supposed to
apply to Kursk region. Source: Trust me, bro.
Then these same press sources relayed that it was only because Biden didn’t
like North Koreans being in Ukraine on Russia’s side (there’s still no proof of
that claim, but it’s already been pushed into the realm of assumed truth). Can’t
have Russia internationalizing this conflict, critics say, even though the West
has literally adopted the strategy of trying to drag the entire planet into it,
either by trying to coax them onto their sanctions bandwagon or emitting clarion
calls for foreign fighters on Ukraine’s side.
Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky did his best impression of an employee left
to manage the shop while all the folks in charge were out for lunch. “Strikes
are not carried out with words. Such things are not announced. Missiles will
speak for themselves,” he said. If and when those missiles do “speak,” they’ll
be saying, “Yo, Washington sent me.” Because no one’s letting the Ukrainians do
any driving that doesn’t involve sitting on an adult’s lap.
Why? Well, because Ukraine wasted zero time in crashing one of the rare F-16
fighter jets gifted by the West. A German government coalition lawmaker told Der
Spiegel earlier this year that the country’s Leopard 2 battle tanks have
virtually all been blown up or are broken down and sitting in the repair shop,
and the Ukrainian forces are reportedly even further aggravating the damage by
attempting repairs.
So Russia knows that Western long-range missiles, which only Western military
personnel can operate, aren’t being fired by Kiev. For Washington to even
suggest otherwise would be like the driver of a car trying to pawn off
responsibility for a crash on the toddler in the backseat with the toy “turn and
learn” steering wheel. Slicing through the whole charade, Russian President
Vladimir Putin amended Moscow’s nuclear doctrine to hold co-responsible a
nuclear state that assists a non-nuclear state, like Ukraine, in targeting
Russian territory.
The Western establishment has taken the amendment as a political move. Probably
because they considered Washington’s ATACMS use policy escalation purely
political, too, just tossing it out into the public domain through the
establishment press about as casually as order suggestions for the next pizza
night.
It’s not like Putin is going to actually use nukes or anything, they figure.
Guess the idea is just to find out exactly how far they can go in hitting
Russian soil with Western weapons until they’re proven wrong, then? Brilliant
idea. It’s not like Putin didn’t make NATO’s militarization and Nazification of
Ukraine very specific red lines and then reacted when they were crossed, much to
NATO’s apparent shock and amazement.
Whatever happened to the West’s insistence on stopping Putin in Ukraine so he
doesn’t rampage through Europe like King Kong? Or how about NATO saying a year
ago that he wanted a full-blown war with the alliance? Now suddenly they’re
staking planetary peace entirely on their apparently abundant confidence in
Putin’s benevolence and aversion to war when it comes to nothing less than
targeting and striking Russian territory directly with their own weapons while
they pretend that Zelensky isn’t just relegated to making the French fries?
And all this without a single debate or vote in US Congress for the record?
Guess they’re in a rush to get what they want before the new manager arrives –
because incoming President-elect Donald Trump has already made it clear that
he’d de-escalate.
At least the Washington back room perma-bros responsible for concocting policy
should have the integrity to wait until someone can actually be held accountable
by voters, history, and the rest of the planet, for potentially kicking off a
direct war between the US and Russia. Because Biden could hardly even be held
accountable for what he ordered for breakfast.
COPYRIGHT 2024 RACHEL MARSDEN